The Jackets grab another coveted ACC road victory against Boston College on their senior day. It was a solid performance all-around, led by another eye-popping game from Jeremis Smith. Listen, I'm not going to dare and suggest that this team will win four games in a row in the ACC tourney. Based on the resume this season, it just ain't gonna happen. However, there's a small part of me that won't let it go completely. With solid defense like against Clemson or BC and some respectable rebounding, this team could rip off a small run. They've got the offensive ability. It's entirely possible. Honestly, another factor is our ability to finally win on the road. What have we won - 4 ACC road games? You know, it's kinda, sorta hard to just completely rule out the possiblity that they could do it................... even though they won't.
Here are my keys to winning the ACC tourney:
- Lights out defense - it's got to be Clemson / BC game caliber D........ can't be the D that has characterized this team most of the year, which is near worst in the conference.
- Rebounding - somehow we have to get back control of the paint. We won't win four in-a-row if we're outrebounded every game. We give up too many easy offensive putbacks. Gani has to establish himself. Alade has to stop getting pushed around in the lane. Zach needs to spend a little more time in the paint and less time roaming the perimeter. I'd like to see D'Andre Bell be more aggressive going after a few boards.
- Ball control - this team has shown a solid ability to control the ball and limit turnovers. That will continue to be key. Mo Miller and Matt Causey MUST dictate tempo. They must push the game, but they must limit turnovers and easy buckets for opponents.
- Stamina - winning 4 games in 4 days. Ouch. I don't think it's been done yet by any team in the ACC tourney (not 100% sure). Coach Hewitt is going to have to balance out playing guys it will take to win versus trying not to wear them out in case they move on.
There's something else. I just can't help but dream and wonder what this team would have been like had Jeremis Smith played this way since he was ... maybe a sophomore. Don't get me wrong. Jeremis has been a workhorse since he got here. I said it yesterday - you can always count on 12/7. However, his game has been 95% in-and-around the basket. Jeremis with a consistent 10-12 foot jumper would change the complexion of the team if you ask me. It certainly did last night. So where has that jumper been? When JS came out of high school, his reputation was that of an all-around player. He WAS an inside-outside guy. He did take jumpers. So what happened? Well, I think it's a combination of things.
- Coach Hewitt needed him to play a certain role. He was needed inside as a banger. We didn't really "need" his jumper as much as we needed his brute strength. He's been on teams with plenty of decent shooters, but not enough tough, insider enforcers. Jeremis gravitated towards that part of his game. Even though he is clearly undersized, he plays bigger and stronger than this size.
- Confidence. I can vaguely remember about 4-6 short stretches during Jeremis's GT career where he tried to expand his range. I almost remember one stretch last season where Coach Hewitt specifically commented on giving Jeremis a green light to take more shots. However, I also remember a vast array of bricks. Face it - his jumper never looked great during his career. Those experiments were mostly short-lived.
Why all-of-the-sudden now? Why is that part of his game clicking now at the end of his career? Who knows. Maybe confidence. Maybe an "it'll be over soon" attitude. Maybe just some luck or a hot streak. However, watching it happen just makes me wonder what could have been.


6 comments:
This team is Jeckyl and Hyde defined. It's why this season has been so frustrating and disappointing. Yes, it is possible we could do some damage in the ACC tourney, but it is also possible we could lay an egg as we did last year. Talentwise and athlete-wise, we should not fear anyone. Which persona will our team show next week, anyone's guess is as good as mine?
Its amazing how good this basketball team is when it plays tough defense with confidence. Wathing the BC game, I just thought they expected to win from the tipoff, which is impressive anywhere on the road in the ACC.
Even after a frustrating season, count me as still on the Hewitt bandwagon. I think his main problems this year boil down to failing to handle the unexpected defection of both Young and Crittendon to the NBA, and setting up an early season schedule that was just way too difficult.
Until Paul gets a NBA crystal ball or starts getting at least 2 McDonalds All-Americans per year like Coach K or Coach Williams, I think he handled things about as well as could be expected.
I honestly think after watching this team most of the season that they actually play "team ball" alot better than last year's NCAA team. Last year we just had more individual talent to resort to when necessary. This year's team usually looks like they know what they are doing out there, which hasn't always been the case in the past.
And props to Matt Causey. His attitude/hustle was great to watch all year. Every team should have a Matt Causey or a Mario West. That should just be a requirement.
Good luck in the ACC and maybe the NIT if we can make a really good run.
Nice write up!! The only thing I could think of to comment on is the fact that we already ask D-BELL to guard the best player on every team and he does a great job of that. Getting rebounds is kind of tough after chasing the opposing teams best player around all game.
For those who don't think the program is going in the right direction chew on this. We lost 5 ACC games this year at home by a total of 8 points. That's 1.6 points per games difference. Basically if 5 possessions go differently we are looking at 12-4 versus 7-9. The game at Clemson was really the only blowout we had in ACC play. All this after losing our two best players and top defender from the prior year. I think we should all take a step back and appreciate the fact that CPH and Co. have done a good job with this team.
jekyl and hyde comment is right on. it's amazing how a team can look so good one game and almost unwatchable the next. something i've noticed over the last few games is better ball movement. one of my frustrations w/ hewitt is the stand around offense but they have really been passing well lately.
another thing that's plain and simple - some people have just really stepped up lately. jsmith and peackock are 2 that come to mind.
if the good tech team shows up, it could definitely be an interesting tourney. i think the nit may consider tech if they win their first 2 games. go jackets!
I'm sorry, but don't see how "anonymous" can be so pleased with the direction of the program:
- First off, we have a LOSING record. Not a mediocre Chan-like record, but a LOSING record.
- Our ACC record the last 4 years is 27-37. Hmmm, that’s a losing record, too.
- We lost in the first round in both tourneys last year. Oh, and the ACC tourney the year before…..that’s 0-3 in post season tourneys the last two years… which again is a losing record.
- We have a total of 1 recruit coming in next year.
- Then there's the player turnover due to transfers and academics, which has been way too high.
-The graduation rate is 42% (football’s is 51%, baseballs 61%) and since Marvin Lewis left, (who was from Cremins' last class) our presence on any all-academic teams has been slim to none.
I’m NOT saying fire the coach, but I don’t see how you can look at the facts and consider this a program moving in the right direction.
Post a Comment